XFCE was never as memory efficient as people claimed. I tried LXQt with Fedora by manually installing it over a Fedora LXDE installation. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Top Pro ••• Great for low performance hardware. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. Beitrag von Revod » 19.11.2019 17:37:32 Hallo LX( DE - Qt ) Freunde Das neueste LxQt ( In meine zwei 64 bit Rechner - lxde in meine zwei 32 bit ) an sehr nützliche Funktionalität gewonnen, womit man sehr speditiv arbeiten. It appears to be a great choice for weak old laptops and things like that. From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional; XFCE: Light, simple, efficient; Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative; KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished; 1. What about when I … If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. I have used the Xfce desktop in Mint for many years, and it remains my choice in LM 19. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. LXQt is much the same as LXDE, as you may guess from the name. Und zum eigentlichen Thema dieses Threads: Ich habe mir vor einigen Wochen LXQT mal testweise installiert und fand's eher grauslich. Top. Was lxqt ausmacht, kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber Xubuntu braucht deutlich mehr Ressourcen als das bisherige Lubuntu insbesondere wegen der Gnome-Anteile, die es komfortabel, aber auch fetter machen. Comparison of ease of use and stability. It has quite cool combination of LXDE and XFCE. I also had problems with Falcon browser, but that might have been the OS, or just Falcon browser - maybe the rest of the OS is fine. Meines Wissens ist weiterhin lxde Default. This is the testing setup: Debian testing: Clean install in Virtualbox 5.1.6 (2016-10-02) CPU: 2-core; RAM: 512 MB; Resolution: 1024 x 768; Desktop environments: LXQt 0.11, XFCE: 4.12.3, Cinnamon 3, Gnome 3.20 Haven't done proper measurements, but if memory serves, the RAM use is similar. LXDE vs Xfce Xfce is not as light as LXDE and LXQT. Eine weitere Gemeinsamkeit: Lubuntu wie Xubuntu haben … I'd guess XFCE just because it's older. Installing Xfce on Ubuntu will turn it into Xubuntu, won’t it? Completely trash. Damit diese im nächsten Frühjahr nicht alle archiviert werden müssen, ist eure Mithilfe gefragt! But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have features and see which one has the most of them. lxde vs. lxqt. The objective of this guide is to install LXQt desktop as an alternative desktop environment for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa Desktop/Server Linux. Was lxqt ausmacht, kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber Xubuntu braucht deutlich mehr Ressourcen als das bisherige Lubuntu insbesondere wegen der Gnome-Anteile, die es komfortabel, aber auch fetter machen. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. Their basic difference lies in the fact that LXQT makes the use of Qt and not GTK+. Weniger Ressourcenverbrauch ist ja als Argument ok, aber der Rest , Ohne Metaphern wären unsere Sprache aber doch um einiges ärmer. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Explicitly noob-friendly. That's kinda surprising. The LXDE and LXQt desktops feel like they've been around forever, gliding through user actions with ease, finding just the right balance between explanatory prompts and minimal design. 1 year ago. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. LXQt with Openbox appears to be really light and uses barely more than 220 MB RAM. However, this is not the only deciding factor. All the default settings are sensible, and 90% of what most users need to do on a desktop is covered (I'm reserving a conservative 10% for unique personal tastes that nobody expects any desktop to guess). Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. Its infrastructure has been around for years, which means that MATE has been thoroughly tested and is thus less prone … See All Specs. 4. To put it in simple words, LXDE looks very simple plain. KDE's file manager Dolphin is described as focused on usability. Init-System: Systemd. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. XFCE runs at around 650MB on my Debian system and LXQT uses around 1GB of RAM. . The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of LXQt 0.16.0, the Lightweight Qt Desktop Environment. Es heißt ja LXDE (Lubuntu) wäre dezent weniger anspruchsvoll bei den Ressourcen als Xfce (was selbst auch nicht besonders anspruchsvoll ist). 10% aller Wikiartikel. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Neben dem Standarddesktop Gnome 3 stehen KDE, XFCE, LXQT, Mate, Cinnamon und LXDE in installierbaren Livesystemen zur Verfügung. Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. My Arch system running KDE is using only 505 MB of RAM. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Any distro, any platform! One of the features of LXQt is that it has comparatively low resource requirements. Read more... Release qtermwidget 0.16.0. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Easy on the specs and still blazingly fast. 750 Artikel, die nur für Xenial getestet sind. As to stability, that's hard to test. Verdict and conclusion. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only part of the story. In fact, LXQt 0.11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of screengrab 2.1.0. What is the difference between xfce4 and xubuntu-desktop packages? If you prefer a software Qt and you need a less loaded desktop, LXQt is easy. If you install the xfce4 package, you just get the Xfce desktop and some basic packages included in the Xfce desktop such as Thunar file manager. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of qtermwidget 0.16.0. And is one more stable than the other? Many errors. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. Wie verhält sich das, seit Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LxQt einsetzt? The release can be downloaded from Github. Gerade im Umgang mit Computern ist es wohl ein menschliches Bedürfnis, technischen Inhalten etwas von ihrer Immaterialität, Abstraktheit oder Fremdheit zu nehmen, indem man sich aus dem Wortschatz der vertrauten Alltagswelt bedient: Mein Zeigegerät ist im wörtlichen Sinn nicht wirklich eine "Maus"; wenn ich im Internet "surfe" bin ich kein Wassersportler; mein "abgestürzter" Rechner ist nicht vom Tisch gefallen ... Ja selbst die grafischen "Oberflächen", von denen Du selbst sprichst, kann ich nicht anfassen. Back in the GNOME 2 days, it was a littlelighter, but if you wanted it to do everything that GNOME could, it ended up being roughly just as heavy. Questions are encouraged. "Low system resource consumption" is the primary reason people pick Xfce over the competition. Comparison of the best lightweight Linux desktop environments. So, I guess that's my question here, will Linux Mint LXQt become a reality, or is it only wishful thinking? Release Schedule: LTS. Archived. Dies entspricht ca. Da heißt es weiter warten.... It is a desktop environment best suited for those looking for a traditional, seamlessly working desktop. It’s certainly lightweight and faster than Gnome or KDE which used to take _ages_ to load on that 2012 era laptop of mine, which I use for such experiments. I've been using Ubuntu 19.10 on my main computer since 3 days ago. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE. Linux introductions, tips and tutorials. Der Ressourcenverbrauch ist überdies höher als bei LXDE, in etwa wohl vergleichbar mit XFCE. Bevor die Unterstützung für LXDE-Lubuntu ausläuft (2017), werde ich mich vermutlich nach einer alternativen "schlanken" Distribution umschauen müssen. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. I haven't had stability issues with either. Letztlich wird der Rechner nicht dicker oder dünner bzw. On the other hand, Xfce gives you the feel of a modern environment of the desktop. Packages in xubuntu-desktop - abiword abiword-common abiword-plugin-grammar abiword-plugin-mathview apt-offline blueman brltty-x11 catfish desktop-base exo-utils gigolo 16.04 wird weiterhin auf LXDE setzen. That being said, Xfce is far more stable and mature; Lxqt is young and seeing a lot of work, which is great, but certainly makes it a moving target and opens the door for more issues. Eine besondere Hürde stellen Metaphern übrigens ironischerweise gerade für Projekte der Künstlichen Intelligenz dar, die Computern das Verstehen natürlicher Sprachen beizubringen versuchen. If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. Well, if they are about the same for resource usage (which is pretty good and lightweight), then I guess it’s up to personal preference when it comes to deciding between LXQT and XFCE. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. There’s also a workspace switcher, giving a layer of user experience that not every DE does. Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of memory. LXQt has less panel applications than Xfce and the default openbox window manager does not have compositing. XFCE runs at around 650MB on my Debian system and LXQT uses around 1GB of RAM. A fork of GNOME 2, MATE had its latest stable release 1.22 on March 18th, 2019 (as of October 2019). xubuntu-desktop, on the other hand is XFCE + additional packages to improve the user experience. UpbeatNane's Experience. Default Desktop Environment: Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, GNOME, i3, KDE Plasma, LXQt, MATE, Xfce. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. I have them both installed but I use XFCE more due to the customization. Top Con ••• Not for everyone. Today, XFCE is really the only option if you want a very functional light-weight desktop. I use peppermint. A review of MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. Xfce vs Mate vs Lxde vs LxQT. It follows a traditional desktop paradigm – there’s an application menu with a search function in the bottom left, a system tray in the bottom right, and some icons in the panel for favorite or common applications. fraxinus_63 Level 4 Posts: 217 Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:25 pm. See More. It just so happens that I recently tried these as well as lxqt in antiX running from a usb with persistence enabled and while lxde, enlightenment and lxqt used much less RAM (around 300mb) they don't compare with xfce when it comes to ease of use and customization (at least for me). So thats how i found manjaro and im right now downloading xfce version for test. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. It also has slightly fewer configuration features. Close. Read more... Release screengrab 2.1.0. It consumes around 380mb ram on boot. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. Etwas offtopic, aber ich finds immer witzig, dass die grafischen Oberflächen mit Masseneinheiten verglichen werden. Xfce vs. MATE. Press J to jump to the feed. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Linux Mint MATE. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop. Ubuntu nutzt standardmäßig die Desktopumgebung Gnome, Lubuntu LXQt (vormals LXDE) und Xubuntu Xfce. Cookies help us deliver our Services. leichter oder schwerer. Re: Linux Mint LXQt. When I say 'Xfce,' it’s a good bet you think about a lean, responsive Linux desktop environment that’s particularly light on system memory usage. Both desktop environments claim to be lightweight, but which one is more lightweight? The rest of the things remain the same. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. Xfce: The Mint implementation of Xfce is beautiful right out of the box, and it has all the features I want or need, with the exception of the multiple-monitor management provided by Cinnamon. Posted by 1 year ago. MATE. Wie verhält sich das, seit Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LxQt einsetzt? GNOME's graphical file manager Files (Nautilus) is intended to be very easy to use and has many features. See More. … Auch Manjaro ist … Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. XFCE is only the desktop environment. Xfce vs Mate vs Lxde vs LxQT. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. Aktuell gibt es im Wiki ca. Könnte man evtl. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. Note that Razor-qt has become LXQt, a port of LXDE to the Qt framework.. xfce takes up 300mb ona new arch install and lxqt around 500 on a new arch install, oc that varies but thats what i got on the same laptop with fresh installs, That’s not that big a difference, but then again, if the laptop is something low end, it could be the difference between usable and barely usable, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linux4noobs community. Xfce, Cinnamon, and LXDE are probably your best bets out of the 13 options considered. I personally like LXQt for my gaming PC though. As XFCE is slowly dying, and LXDE is merging with Razor-qt, LXQt becomes a very attractive options for all those who wish to use a desktop envrionment that is light on ressources. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. Du hast also bis 2019 Zeit und kannst dir dann auch LXQt noch mal ansehen , Systemverwaltung, Installation, Aktualisierung, Vor der Installation und grundlegende Fragen, 2004 – 2020 ubuntuusers.de • Einige Rechte vorbehalten. If you prefer GTK+, you’re better off using Xfce. sagen, das nun Xfce hier den geringsten Anspruch hat, weil LxQt durch Qt nun etwas mehr benötigt? I have them both installed but I use XFCE more due to the customization. And now i've been thinking to try out something that's not Debian based and its easy at the same time.